Abortion has always been a controversial issue and will always be one. Whenever the political live wire of abortion is thrust into the political arena for any reason, it should be considered only on its own merits. Unrelated issues should never be dragged in.
Sadly, that is just what happened in Texas with the federally backed Women’s Health Program. When another issue, of health care for indigent women, became linked to abortion, Texas lost $35 million in federal funds.
The loss of the federal dollars threatened wellness examinations, cancer screenings and contraception for 130,000 economically challenged women in the state.
Now the state is in the process of establishing a Texas Women’s Health Program that will be state-funded.
One of the proposed rules would prevent participating physicians from providing “counseling concerning the use of abortion as a method of family planning.” Physician groups have objected, on the basis of its interference with patient-physician relations.
If wellness examinations and cancer screenings could have been separated legislatively from the contraception part of the Women’s Health Program, women who needed such services would still have access to them, with 90 percent of the costs covered by federal dollars.
As it is, health care for low-income women continues to be held hostage in a dispute that has little to do with screenings and examinations that could help keep them in good health.
— Lubbock (Texas) Avalanche-Journal
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less