AUGUSTA — Gov. Janet Mills shut the door on legalized sports betting on Friday when she vetoed a bill that would have seen Maine join 12 other states that have approved gambling on sporting events, both in person and online.

The bill, one of three Mills vetoed, was among 40 she had held since the end of the last lawmaking session in June, saying they had technical issues or needed additional work. The Legislature recalled 13 of the bills on Wednesday – the sports betting bill was not among them – to allow lawmakers to make changes to satisfy her concerns before sending them back to her for consideration.

The governor allowed the 24 other bills to become law without her signature. Under the Maine Constitution, she had to make a decision on the bills before midnight Saturday.

Sen. Louis Luchini, D-Ellsworth, sponsored the sports betting bill and was disappointed by Mills’ veto. He was in San Diego on Friday at a conference for states with gambling and said Mills called to inform him of her decision shortly before she released her two-page veto message to the public.

“I appreciate that she took a real thoughtful approach and researched the topic thoroughly and I’m willing to keep working on it to make it a more acceptable measure for anyone who has issues with it,” Luchini said. He noted, however, that as many as 20 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia are poised to legalize sports betting and collect tax revenue from it in 2020.

Estimates on how much sports betting would be worth in Maine varied widely, but a fiscal note attached to the bill suggests that if it were fully implemented, originally scheduled to occur in 2023, the state would collect as much as $5 million a year in fees and taxes. However, sports betting revenue forecasts fell dramatically short in several states that legalized it in 2018 and 2019.


Supporters of the bill say millions of dollars in illegal sports betting, much of it online and with offshore entities, already is taking place in Maine without the state receiving tax revenue.

Mills’ veto message downplayed the revenue considerations and focused on the harm the legislation could have on youth and low-income Mainers.

“Before Maine joins the frenzy of states hungry to attract this market, I believe we need to examine the issue more clearly; better understand the evolving experiences of other states; and thoughtfully determine the best approach for Maine,” Mills wrote. “That approach needs to balance the desire to suppress gambling activities now being conducted illegally and the need to protect youthful gamblers and those least able to absorb losses under a closely regulated scheme.”

The bill would have prohibited betting on youth sports, including high school athletics, but left the door open to some amateur and semi-pro sporting events.

Mills also vetoed a legislation sponsored by Senate President Troy Jackson, D-Allagash, that involved providing a state tax credit against the state’s forestry excise tax for companies that are based in the U.S. and employ U.S. citizens for 75 percent of their workforce.

The other bill the governor vetoed would have allowed candidates to use their nicknames on Maine election ballots instead of their legal names. The bill was sponsored by state Rep. William “Billy Bob” Faulkingham, R-Winter Harbor. Faulkingham argued many people are known mostly by their nicknames and using their legal name on the ballot can put them at a competitive disadvantage.


The sports betting bill, which would have given just about every entity with an interest in gambling a slice of the revenue, faced no formal opposition in the Legislature beyond some lawmakers voicing concern over problem gamblers. The bill would allow casino operators, off-track betting parlors, harness racing tracks and Native American tribes in Maine to host sports betting operations.

The veto will be the subject of an override vote, with a two-thirds majority in both the House and the Senate required to overturn Mills’ decision. The only roll-call vote on the bill taken in the Legislature so far was in the Senate last June, when the measure was approved, 19-15, with a mix of Republicans and Democrats both supporting and opposing the measures. The bill gained unanimous approval in subsequent votes.

Maine’s casino operators in Bangor and Oxford supported the measure, which would have allowed them to take sports bets at their facilities. They said sports betting was just one more activity that could help draw customers to their businesses and keep them competitive with casinos in the states that allow it.

House Minority Leader Kathleen Dillingham, R-Oxford, supported the measure – her district includes the Oxford Casino – and was disappointed by the governor’s action.

“Though there may remain questions concerning potential revenues from this industry, it is clear that many Mainers already participate in sports wagering,” Dillingham said in an email Friday night. “I am concerned with our lack of oversight and the absence of consumer protections for those choosing to participate in this type of wagering.”

In May of 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a federal prohibition on sports betting, and since then a dozen states – New Hampshire was the most recent state to allow the practice – have joined Nevada in allowing gambling on sporting events.

Among the 13 bills recalled by the Legislature are proposals to develop a dental health benefit for low-income children and adults; grant to Maine Indian tribes the authority to prosecute domestic violence crimes committed on tribal lands by native and non-native members; and improve programs aimed at helping state prison inmates successfully re-enter society after they complete their sentences.

The 24 bills going into law without Mills’ signature include one requiring the manufacturers of opioid drugs sold in Maine to pay an annual fee, another prohibiting lobbyists from donating to candidates for the Legislature or governor’s office year round – currently lobbyists are only restricted from making donations when the Legislature is in session – and a bill that exempts pet food pantries from the state sales tax.


Related Headlines

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.