July 12, 2013

Our View: Consumers should have permanent watchdog

Sen. Collins should not support a filibuster on the nomination of Director Richard Cordray.

Richard Cordray's visit to Maine this week should remind everybody why we need an active Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Richard Cordray
click image to enlarge

Richard Cordray, interim director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, held a hearing in Portland this week to look into abuses in the debt collection industry. His nomination as permanent director of the federal agency is in jeopardy because of a Senate power play.

2012 File Photo/The Associated Press

Cordray, who is interim director of the new agency, held a hearing in Portland to look into abuses in the debt collection industry. Since the Great Recession, about 30 million Americans have had a debt go into collection, and while many companies follow the rules, some do not and use deception, threats and intimidation to coerce payment. There are laws on the books against that, but if there's no enforcement and people don't know their rights, it's practically impossible to stop the practices.

The panel of regulators heard about creditors who tell debtors that making payments on their debt will improve their credit scores even though it won't in many cases. They also heard about creditors who go after debts that have already been paid, which is also against the law.

Cordray came to Maine to listen, but that he was here spoke volumes. His nomination as the permanent director of the agency is in jeopardy because of a long-standing power play in the U.S. Senate, where no Republican will allow his nomination to come forward for a confirmation vote unless the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is substantially weakened.

The Republicans are using the Senate rules to make changes in the law that they couldn't achieve through the democratic process. Maine Sen. Susan Collins voted for Dodd-Frank in 2010, but so far she has stood with her colleagues on the Cordray nomination filibuster.

This is not only bad process, it's also bad policy.

Five years after a consumer debt bubble burst, sending the whole nation into a deep recession, there should not be any dispute that we need careful government oversight of these transactions. A subprime mortgage here and a too-big-to-pay balloon payment there may look like small problems on their own. But in 2008, there were enough of them to create a foreclosure crisis that took down the whole economy.

Cordray's agency educates the public, enforces regulations and studies trends in a number of areas like student loans and credit card debt that directly affect people's lives. The agency's work is hugely important to individuals, who need a champion when they are up against powerful institutions.

Collins should drop her support for a filibuster of the Cordray nomination. Instead, if she thinks it is necessary, she should work to get majority support for changes in the agency. The nation needs a strong consumer protection bureau, and Cordray deserves a chance to do the job.

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)