February 21

Letter to the editor: Is Searsport propane storage tank golden opportunity for Maine?

Tux Turkel’s article Feb. 18, “Propane’s promise as Maine fuel in jeopardy,” covered the situation remarkably well, except for one hole.

He notes in passing the proposed propane storage tank in Searsport, which “had the potential to be used for export.” That completely misses its declared intent: to import propane.

He quotes Kim Tucker, an opponent of the tank, as opposing the export of U.S. propane.

If DCP Midstream were permitted to build the tank, would that have created enough imported propane supply in Maine to reduce the price from its record this winter? Do we have enough ships and barges to deliver the cheaper domestic propane from the U.S. Gulf to Searsport?

One other propane transport option: Reverse the flow of the crude oil pipeline from South Portland to Montreal, and deliver propane here.

These choices are worth exploring, especially if those of us, like myself, who burn propane are willing to face the risks its transport entails. I hope Mr. Turkel investigates whether the Searsport tank was a golden opportunity Maine missed.

Chalmers “Chop” Hardenbergh

editor, Atlantic Northeast Rails & Ports



Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)