For weeks, Western officials have warned that a massive buildup of Russian troops on the border with Ukraine signaled a plan by Moscow to invade. In the early morning hours there Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced what he said was a “special military operation” in Ukraine.

Explosions could be heard in Kyiv, Ukraine’s capital, and Kharkiv, in the country’s northeast – the opening salvos of a broad attack on Ukraine from multiple directions. Reports of mounting casualties emerged, and large crowds of Ukrainians and foreigners fled the capital as Ukrainian forces tried to stem the advance of Russian troops and air power. The offensive could ignite a wider regional conflict and destabilize Europe, sending hundreds of thousands of refugees into neighboring countries.

“The situation requires us to take decisive, swift action,” Putin said in a speech, adding that Moscow would carry out the “demilitarization and denazification” of Ukraine and end eight years of war in the eastern part of the country, where pro-Russian separatists have been battling the government in Kyiv. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba called it “a war of aggression” and urged the world to “stop Putin.”

Russia says that it wants guarantees Ukraine will be barred from joining NATO – a non-starter for the alliance, which maintains an open-door policy. But a full-blown invasion would come at a steep cost to Russia, potentially leading to widespread casualties and economic suffering from Western sanctions.

APTOPIX Ukraine Tensions

A Ukrainian police officer carrying an assault rifle walks on a platform as people waiti for a Kiev-bound train in Kostiantynivka, the Donetsk region, eastern Ukraine, on Thursday. Vadim Ghirda/Associated Press

What is the historical relationship between Russia and Ukraine?

Ukraine occupies an important place in Russian history. Together with Belarus, it formed the medieval Kyivan Rus state that Moscow and Kyiv claim laid the foundation of their countries.


Kyiv was a significant city in the 9th and 10th centuries, before the economic power in the region shifted east. Later, parts of what is now Ukraine became part of the Russian Empire, but other parts, particularly in the west, had more ties to European powers.

Amid the 1917 revolutions in Russia, nationalist movements in the country grew rapidly. The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic was founded shortly afterward and would become one of the founding members of the Soviet Union — though that organization was dominated by its far larger neighbor, the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic.

Ukrainian people suffered greatly during the Soviet Union, with famine in 1932 to 1933 killing millions in a disaster blamed on policies from Moscow. The famine was later recognized as a genocide by the independent Ukrainian government. It was also the site of some of the worst violence of World War II, when Nazi Germany occupied much of the land.

How did their relationship change after the collapse of the Soviet Union?

As the Soviet Union was collapsing, Ukrainians voted to become an independent state in a referendum in 1991. The country also became a democracy – albeit, an imperfect one.

Like its neighboring Russia, the independent and democratic Ukraine suffered through economic hardships and high levels of corruption. However, it had an additional complexity in its relationship with Moscow.


While many in Ukraine sought a closer relationship with the West – including for some, aspirationally, membership in NATO or the European Union – in the early 2000s Russia’s new president, Putin, viewed these developments with alarm. There are large Russian and Russian-speaking populations in Ukraine, particularly in the east of the country near the border.

Tensions burst out into the open in 2014, when a series of pro-Western protests in Kyiv ousted the Moscow-aligned Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych. Russia invaded and annexed the Crimean Peninsula from Kyiv shortly afterward, a move Europe and the United States have said was illegal.

Since 2014, there has also been a simmering conflict between Ukrainian forces and Russian-backed separatists in the self-declared “people’s republics” in Donetsk and Luhansk, two eastern regions that border Russia.

Why are tensions so high now?

Late last year, Western officials began warning of a huge buildup of Russian troops near the border with Ukraine. U.S. officials have said that roughly 190,000 Russian soldiers had amassed by mid-February, warning that Moscow may stage a fake attack to justify an invasion.

For Putin, Ukraine has become a focal point of broader ire with the West. In an article posted on the Kremlin’s website last July, Putin described Russians and Ukrainians as one people and wrote that the “true sovereignty of Ukraine is possible only in partnership with Russia.”


When announcing in February that Russia would formally recognize the separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk, Putin appeared to suggest that Ukraine was an aberration of history.

“Modern Ukraine was entirely and fully created by Russia, more specifically the Bolshevik, communist Russia,” Putin said in a speech to the Russian nation on Feb. 21.

This obsession with Ukraine has long existed in Moscow. Czarist leaders referred to Ukraine as “little Russia” and said that its language “never existed, does not exist, and shall not exist.” Soviet leader Vladimir Lenin had his own maxim — “If we lose Ukraine, we lose our head” — while Mikhail Gorbachev later said that there could be no Soviet Union without Ukraine, and no Ukraine without the union.

Ukraine’s growing relationship with NATO has been of intense interest to Putin, however. The Russian president has long wanted a “sphere of influence” over former Soviet states and has a significant interest in Ukraine, which is “potentially most likely to join NATO,” said Matthew Sussex, a Russia expert at the Griffith Asia Institute in Australia.

It is “clear that Russia’s fundamental concerns have been ignored,” Putin said in early February of U.S. and NATO proposals to de-escalate the crisis.

Could a war backfire for Russia?


A military assault on Ukraine could backfire on Russia by spurring NATO to increase its presence in Eastern Europe. The United States has already sent more troops to the region, and Russia’s moves have united Western leaders in the face of the threat.

Economic ramifications are also a major concern. Washington and European allies announced a first wave of sanctions Tuesday that targeted Russian banks and Kremlin-connected “elites.” Germany also halted the authorization of a major gas pipeline connecting Russia to Europe.

After the Russian assault on Thursday, leaders with the Group of Seven powers, NATO and the European Union said they would impose fresh sanctions. South Korea said it would join them in penalizing Russia.

Russian officials dismissed the potential impact of the measures, arguing that Russia has weathered sanctions before. But there’s also the cost of occupying Ukraine in the post-invasion period. Officials say that Ukrainians are unlikely to accept a Russian-installed government and would probably mount a strong resistance.

A full-scale invasion could lead to thousands of Russian casualties, in addition to tens of thousands of civilian deaths in Ukraine. Because many Russian citizens have personal ties to Ukraine, the bloodshed could create problems for Putin on the domestic front.

More than half of Russians say that a global war is one of their biggest fears, according to a recent poll. Putin also faces other challenges at home, including a surge in coronavirus cases and an economic downturn.

John Hudson in Washington and Bryan Pietsch and Amy Cheng in Seoul contributed to this report.

Related Headlines

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.